|
as land-use debate heats up By Frank Munger Land use on the government's Oak
Ridge reservation is a hot topic, scorching hot, as evidenced by the crowd
(more than 200 people) that attended a public forum last week.
The battle lines are classic preservation
versus development and it seems like everybody has an opinion about how
to use the Department of Energy s 34,000-acre showplace (what's left of
the original 60,000 acres of farmland absconded for the World War II Manhattan
Project).
This vast expanse, of course, already
is home to various federal installations, such as Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant and East Tennessee Technology Park -- the
former K-25 uranium-enrichment plant now being converted to private industrial
use.
Other areas have been targeted for
future DOE activities, including a large part of Chestnut Ridge where construction
is underway on the $1.4 billion Spallation Neutron Source -- the big project
that's supposed to make Oak Ridge the world's leading research center for
neutron sciences.
The current controversy relates
to the thousands of mostly forested acres "unused" on DOE's reservation,
at least where there are no major buildings already in place or planned
or where there's no reservoir of buried nuclear waste that would prohibit
future use.
The community is philosophically
divided.
Local governments and business organizations
generally favor additional development of the federal property to attract
new investment, build the tax rolls and boost the retail economy. Conservationists
and environmentalists and hunters have banded together to oppose future
development -- particularly what's been described as a piecemeal approach
that threatens wildlife habitats and the natural systems in place nearby.
What's interesting is how the controversy
has affected the Department of Energy s Oak Ridge Operations.
It has become the defining issue
of Leah Dever's still-brief (year and a half) tenure as Oak Ridge manager,
and she's feeling the heat from the various interest groups, of course,
but also from members of her management staff.
And she has not backed away.
Dever opted to host last week's
public forum, even though it wasn't tied to any decision-making documents
or required by the National Environmental Policy Act. She said it was a
good way for people to talk and maybe learn about others' wishes and concerns.
For weeks, maybe longer, there had
been persistent reports about heated disagreements in the upper-management
tier at DOE's Oak Ridge office about how to proceed on proposals that had
galvanized the land-use controversy.
Dever was seen as regularly taking
the environmental side of things, while reports suggested other managers
such as chief of administration Dan Wilken and assets manager Robert Brown
staunchly promoted DOE's relationship with the Oak Ridge business community
and support for their needs.
Before the start of last week's
meeting, I asked Dever about disunity in the management ranks.
"I would say that most of our managers
are really . . ." She paused and started again, "The last couple of weeks
we've taken a hard look together as a team at our land-use issues."
She said that didn't mean federal
officials were necessarily on the "same page," but noted, "There's been
a lot of discussion, yes, a lot of discussion."
Dever discounted reports that she favored the environmental perspective.
"We have to do what is the right
thing for the future of the Oak Ridge reservation and the Department of
Energy. That's where I line up. I'm not tied to preservationism or economic
development. I have to do the right thing for the U.S. Department of Energy.
That's where I am."
A few minutes after making those
remarks, Dever opened the meeting and, before accepting public comments,
she announced DOE s planned course regarding three proposed developments.
She said she would quickly sign
an environmental assessment that permits the transfer of floodplain property
along the Clinch River. That provides river access for a proposed residential
development nearby on 1,200 acres of land currently owned by the Boeing
Co.
Dever also said DOE hoped to complete
within the next month or so an environmental review that will enable the
transfer of some property at Oak Ridge National Laboratory for private
development. That action is expected to spur the outside investment needed
for a segment of UT-Battelle's lab modernization plan.
The surprise of the evening came
when Dever announced she was putting on hold the transfer of the ED-3 parcel
for an industrial park on the west end of the reservation. She said it
was time to "take a pause and reflect on the overall course and context
of federal land use before proceeding."
Stalling development of 450 acres
for a "mid-level industrial park" near the K-25 plant was mostly a symbolic
gesture because the property will be developed eventually or so it appears.
DOE seems inclined to let the entire west end of the reservation become
an industrial zone.
Still, the news was a stunner, especially
to business executives and officials from local governments who came to
the meeting prepared to lobby for quick action on the ED-3 proposal.
Most shocked of all, however, were
some of Dever's DOE colleagues, who were blind-sided and embarrassed by
the announcement.
Dever had informed only a few close
confidantes of the decision, apparently fearing that if she told other
DOE managers they might inform their business buddies in advance of the
meeting. If alerted, might they have staged a walk-out?
Whatever the reason, her move put
an additional chill on Dever's relationship with some of the DOE managers
she inherited in summer 1999, when she arrived in Oak Ridge. It also may
have earned her the lasting scorn of power brokers in the Oak Ridge business
community, some of whom are already spouting off about plans to oust Dever
from her federal post.
At the same time, Dever probably
won some additional support outside the Oak Ridge establishment and clearly
showed, more than with any other decision since taking the job, that she
is her own person and quite willing to take the risks therein.
Copyright © 2001, Knoxville
News-Sentinel Co.
|